Check out this blog!

Check out this blog:

100 word review: The Buddha of Suburbia

This novel by Hanif Kureishi was really good but, on some level, didn't quite live up to its hype. The plot satires race relations, the art world and the seventies in general beautifully. You'll definitely enjoy it if you like reading about race, sexuality, the seventies and the world of artists and actors. It was a funny book, but not as funny as I had expected, not laughing out loud at any points. I would still, however, highly recommend it and agree with what Salman Rushdie said: "utterly irreverent and wildly improper, but also genuinely touching and truthful". Really good.

100 Word Review: His Illegal Self

His Illegal Self is by twice winner of the Booker Price Peter Carey and from reading this book I can certainly see why has has won those awards. The structure of the novel, with no speech marks, constant change of narrative voice and flashbacks to the past, would be extremely difficult to the average writer and would normally make the book far too confusing to read. However, Carey does it wonderfully and instead of getting confused, the these things only enhanced the story and made it much more original and interesting to read. Everything about it is fantastic, I loved it.

University News

I GOT AN INTERVIEW AT WARWICK!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

Happy Valentines Day!


glitter-graphics.com

100 word review: Burning Bright

I disliked this book after reading the first paragraph. I hated the writing style. It is over descriptive and leaves absolutely nothing to the imagination and the whole book is filled with ambiguous sentences that are meant to make it "dramatic" but just get annoying. The plot itself is quite predictable, implausible in parts but not bad, it would work if written well. The poor writing means the climax takes ages to arrive and is very unsatisfactory. I would only recommend this book if you don't want anything left to the imagination whatsoever. It reminds me of Dan Brown's writing.

"Portrait of a Lady" by T S Eliot (poetry reading)

Yeats, ‘Among School Children’

Hardy, ‘After a Journey’

I don't believe it! there are NO videos on Youtube for Hardy's poem 'After a Journey'! And i can't paste the poem without all the copyright hoo-ha. And there was me thinking I could get everything from youtube!

Frost at Midnight by S.T. Coleridge

Thoughts: which bloody poem?

I was thinking of applying for the scholarship at Ken which would mean writing a critical analysis and appreciation of either Coleridges Frost at Midnight, Hardys After A Journey, Yeats 'Among School Children' or Eliot 'Portrait of a Lady' so I'm going to post them all on here and see what you think instead!

Quote of the day!

"I do not wish women to have power over men but over themselves"

Mary Wollstonecraft

thought of the day: poo

so it's the 5th... the warwick portfolio deadline... and I still haven't got an interview... oh dear...

Quote of the day!

"All opposition creates a state of war"

Simone de Beauvoir

Quote of the day!

"All socities on the verge of death are masculine" (You just gotta love feminists!)

Germaine Greer

Quote of the day!

"No woman gets an orgasm from shining the kitchen floor"

Betty Friedman

EXAMS ARE OVER!

Exams are FINALLY over... phew! Now it's just waiting for the results in March and then more exams in June...woop.

Quote of the day!

"Aren't women prudes if they don't and prostitutes if they do?"

Kate Millet

Quote of the day!

"If civilisation was left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts"

Camille Pagila

Politics Essay: Liberalism

Why do modern liberals support social reform and welfare?

Modern liberal ideas were related to the further development of industrialisation. Social inequality became difficult to ignore as the working class were seen to be disadvantaged. As economic individualism came under attack, liberals rethought their attitude to the state. The minimal state was incapable of rectifying the injustices and inequalities of civil society. Therefore, modern liberals were prepared to advocate an interventionist state.

The modern liberal principle of positive freedom recognises that individual liberty can be threatened by social disadvantage and inequality. By protecting individuals from social evils, the state can expand freedom.

Modern liberals endorsed an enabling state exercising a wide range of social and economic responsibilities. The state could not force people to be good but provide conditions in which they could make more responsible moral decisions. While liberals have a preference for self-reliant individuals that take control of their own lives, they recognise that this can only occur if social conditions are conducive to it.

Social reform and welfare therefore help to expand individual freedom and enhance self-reliance by reducing social inequalities.

Modern liberals defend welfarism on the basis of equality of opportunity. The state has a social responsibility to reduce or remove social disadvantages to create equal or more equal life chances.

John Rawls developed a defence of redistribution and welfare based on the idea of ‘equality of fairness’. If people were unaware of their social position they would view an egalitarian society as fairer than an inegalitarian one. He proposed the ‘difference principle’ that social and economic inequalities should be arranged so as to benefit the least well-off, recognising the need for some measure of inequality to provide an incentive to work.

The modern liberal support for social reform and welfare boils down to the central thrust of modern liberalism: helping individuals to help themselves.